22 Jul 2009
GH ROSSON V T STREET HOLDINGS LIMITED HC WN CIV 2008-485-2457
- Citation
- openlaw-29c3ccec_ec88_40ca_98e1_dc36dd432c37.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The stay was refused because the applicant failed to prove a substantial miscarriage of justice would be likely if the District Court judgment were enforced and could not provide the necessary security by paying the judgment sum (approximately $40,000) into court; the applicant's substantive arguments about non-renewal and limited liability were weak and had been rejected in the District Court, and the respondent offered to consent to a stay only on condition that the judgment sum be paid into court or trust, which the applicant could not meet.