15 Jul 2008
BIG RIVER PARADISE LIMITED V CONGREVE AND ORS SC 21/2008
- Citation
- SC 21/2008
- Court
- Supreme Court
The applicant's argument was rejected because it was contrary to the covenant's plain and ordinary meaning, would defeat the covenant's protective purpose, and the statutory definition of 'subdivision of land' as it stood when the covenant was executed supported the respondents' position; accordingly leave to appeal was refused.