31 May 2006
INTEC USA, LLC HC AK CIV-2006-404-001018
- Citation
- openlaw-90577934_7657_4370_a458_a44eff7ebf9d.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The application was dismissed for failure to satisfy the jurisdictional threshold under s48A and because the procedure was used for an improper purpose; the applicant's conduct, while improper, was not so egregious as to justify indemnity costs, but warranted increased costs — the nominated witnesses were entitled to costs on category 2B with a 45% uplift and separate counsel were properly instructed.