1 Dec 2023
HALSE v EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY [2023] NZCA 611
- Citation
- [2023] NZCA 611
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The application for leave to appeal is declined because no seriously arguable question of law is identified; the Employment Court correctly held s 184(1A) barred the applicant's s 194 judicial review of an ERA case management direction until the ERA has issued a determination, and the ERA has statutory jurisdiction under ss 134(2) and 161 to entertain claims against persons who aided or abetted breaches, so the strike-out was appropriate.