28 Mar 2006
LOGAN AND ANOR V MILLMAN HOLDINGS LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) HC AK CIV 2005-404-2592
- Citation
- openlaw-c817f378_955c_4c8d_bd14_e4fd3a44d25c.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Leave to appeal was granted limited to two legal questions because they meet the Waller v Hider threshold: (1) whether s 44 permits transfer where the District Court lacked jurisdiction at filing; and (2) whether High Court Rules 229–233 apply retrospectively such that a transferred proceeding is deemed commenced in the High Court from the original District Court commencement date. Other issues were either factual, not properly raised, or lacked sufficient general importance to justify leave.