3 Mar 2021
ROE v UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND [2021] NZHC 368
- Citation
- [2021] NZHC 368
- Court
- High Court
Where a limited‑entry programme is lawfully capped under s224(5) and the council's delegated Limitation Statute, the council may apply academic/recency criteria as lawful selection mechanisms among eligible students (including domestic students aged 20+); because MBChB 2019 and 2020 were heavily oversubscribed and Roe did not meet the recency requirement, the University's decisions to decline her applications were lawful and no relief in judicial review follows.