18 May 2006
MADAN V MADAN HC AK CIV-2005-404-6965
- Citation
- openlaw-48f7c9dd_71d3_42cb_a5a6_8ab551277766.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Leave to adduce the additional documents was refused because the appellant failed to establish the documents' authenticity and cogency, failed to show they could not reasonably have been discovered before the District Court hearing, and in any event they would not have materially affected the trial judge's credibility-based findings; consequently the application was dismissed and costs awarded to the respondent.