25 May 2016
MARTIN v MARTIN [2016] NZCA 225
- Citation
- [2016] NZCA 225
- Court
- Court of Appeal
Leave to bring a second appeal was declined because the disputed issues were essentially factual with concurrent findings below that were reasonably open on the evidence; in any event the farm was correctly classified as relationship property under s 8(1)(ee) (and s 8(1)(e)) given it was acquired for the parties' common use or benefit, so a second appeal had no reasonable prospect of success.