19 Mar 2004
Ellmers v Accident Compensation Corporation
- Citation
- [2004] NZACC 57
- Court
- District Court
The appeal is dismissed because the Court accepted the existence of the decisions and lacked jurisdiction to advance a claim that Catalyst acted without authority; the IRP dated 1 August 2001 contained no entitlements so no review or appeal lay under clause 34(2) and any procedural omission caused no prejudice; the medical assessment complied with s100 by addressing occupational assessment information in medical terms, omission of the caretaker role was immaterial and advantaged the appellant, and delay in delivery of the medical report did not breach a time limit nor cause prejudice.