19 Jul 2018
SMITH v ACCESSIBLE PROPERTIES NEW ZEALAND LIMITED [2018] NZHC 1795
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 1795
- Court
- High Court
Leave to appeal was declined because the proposed legal questions, while involving points of law, were not of sufficient general or public importance to warrant the Court of Appeal considering them; the Act allows a 90 day termination without a merits assessment except for narrow statutory exceptions, and the proposed appeal did not raise a proper legal issue for leave.