14 Aug 2006
CANDILIOTIS V TRANSPACIFIC INDUST. HC WN CIV 2006-485-1775
- Citation
- openlaw-491d655f_d599_4de3_8b45_02527b339a77.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The application for a mandatory interim injunction was declined because, although there is a serious question to be tried on the construction of clause 11.1, the balance of convenience favors the defendant: the defendant has reallocated work, has lost trust in the plaintiff due to the undisclosed side work and lack of candour, and damages are an adequate and quantifiable remedy; therefore mandatory interim relief is inappropriate.