28 Apr 2006
WHATAWHATA PROPERTIES LIMITED V ROBB HC HAM CIV 2005-419-001525
- Citation
- openlaw-99c94504_4bf7_4257_a769_cd11476fdbdd.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The appeal was dismissed because the respondents and their counsel did not act in breach of any duty or in a fraudulent, unconscionable or wilful/reckless manner under r475(4); the director signed the admission with knowledge of the relevant facts, the allegations of agent fraud were late and lacked credibility, and there was no procedural or authority defect in filing the admission that justified setting aside the judgment.