17 Nov 2005
STONNE LIMITED V RONYX HOLDINGS LIMITED HC AK CIV-2005-404-4606
- Citation
- openlaw-379ef1e3_998b_4e55_beca_c5f4c2df9fa4.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The judge found an arguable and substantial dispute because the parties' conduct—issuing, cancelling and reissuing the GST invoice to Gridlock and the evident funding arrangement relying on Gridlock obtaining the GST refund—supported an inference that Gridlock assumed the contractual burden and Stonne was discharged; therefore the statutory demand against Stonne was set aside.