15 Jul 2009
The appeal was dismissed and struck out under s161(3)(b) for failure to prosecute with due diligence; on the merits ACC had paid certified periods and there was no evidence of continuous incapacity or entitlement to further weekly compensation or vocational rehabilitation.
18 Jun 2007
The appeal was struck out for non‑prosecution because counsel withdrew, the appellant could not be located and did not appear at the hearing despite attempts to notify him, making strike‑out the appropriate disposition.
30 Nov 2006
The appeal was struck out for non-prosecution because the appellant failed to comply with directions, did not file submissions and did not appear; consequently there was no effective challenge to the Reviewer's reasoned decision affirming ACC's original determinations, and the strike-out was confirmed.
22 Mar 2004
The applicant did not raise any question of law requiring High Court consideration and failed to provide formal submissions after numerous extensions; accordingly the application for leave to appeal is declined and struck out for non-prosecution.