18 Feb 2013
QH AND LH V CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT HC DUN CIV 2012-412-52
- Citation
- openlaw-64544da4_6452_438a_951b_33e971f960f1.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Leave to adduce further evidence was granted because the Wray decision postdated the Family Court hearing and raised issues sufficiently analogous to this case to constitute special reasons under r 20.16(3); Professor Nussey's evidence may be relevant and capable of influencing the appeal outcome. The admission is conditional: the report must be reformatted into a limited, tailored affidavit and filed promptly, after which directions will be given to manage scope and responses to avoid wholesale re-litigation.