23 Jul 2014
PIPELINE ENTERPRISES LIMITED AND T P MATHEODA V ROCKGAS LIMITED [2014] NZHC 1711
- Citation
- [2014] NZHC 1711
- Court
- High Court
The defendant's applications were refused because there are genuine disputed questions of fact and credibility about whether specific representations were made and relied upon, whether reliance was reasonable, and whether the written non-reliance clause conclusively defeats the claims; those issues require trial rather than summary disposal; accordingly summary judgment, strike out, summary judgment on the counterclaim and security for costs were refused and costs reserved.