17 May 2006
ROBINSON V HEMACHANDRA HOLDINGS (NZ) LIMITED CA CA152/05
- Citation
- openlaw-2c0b8fff_c6e3_44ba_b82c_660fc1a6d8cb.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
Objectively, viewed by a reasonable person, the executed document manifested unqualified acceptance and formed a binding contract despite the defendant's post-dating; therefore specific performance was available and ordered; the Judge's conclusion that acceptance was qualified was incorrect and the cross-appeal on factual findings is dismissed.