28 Apr 2015
SOUTH AUCKLAND TAXI ASSOCIATION LIMITED v JAG MOHAN SINGH RAWAT AND MANPREET KAUR [2015] NZHC 846
- Citation
- [2015] NZHC 846
- Court
- High Court
The arbitrator was not demonstrably wrong: clause 7(b)(v) permits consideration of future harm but requires objective factual evidence to support any subjective belief; the appellant bore the onus to prove entitlement to terminate; hearsay was properly discounted where s18 prerequisites were not shown; and clause 7(b)(vi) did not apply because the respondents had no agreement with an approved taxi organisation.