13 Jul 2010
BLOOMFIELD V R SC 57/2010
- Citation
- SC 57/2010
- Court
- Supreme Court
The application for leave was dismissed because the statement was not shown to be improperly obtained: there was no arguable oppression under s29, any breach of Practice Note r(5) was acknowledged and properly considered by the Court of Appeal under s30(6), there was no real dispute about what the detective said, and the applicant understood her rights and obtained counsel before making admissions, so exclusion was not warranted.