13 Apr 2016
PRAGMA DESIGNER HOMES LIMITED v JIANG [2016] NZHC 677
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 677
- Court
- High Court
The caveat failed the mandatory statutory requirement of s137(2)(c) because it did not adequately disclose how the claimed beneficial interest was derived from the registered proprietor; that non-compliance was fatal to sustaining the caveat and required dismissal of the application despite other arguable inferences on authority.