12 Feb 2016
ALARM NEW ZEALAND LIMITED v 15 HOPETOUN LIMITED [2016] NZHC 152
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 152
- Court
- High Court
The Court found there were sufficient grounds to require more focused discovery, particularly sworn evidence from the defendant's sole director/shareholder (Mr Mahoney) explaining control, location or destruction of documents and communications, because the defendant's affidavit by its CFO was deficient; and an interim restraint on disposal of the defendant's legal or beneficial interest in Level 3 was justified to preserve the plaintiff's rights under the lease and prior undertakings pending further order, therefore the Court ordered a routine affidavit by Mr Mahoney and an interim freezing…