9 Sept 2011
VATSYAYANN V PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE HC HAM CIV-2011-419-000511
- Citation
- openlaw-ec8e30fa_af94_4253_9a2a_90c51de6c058.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The application to admit the appellant's affidavit under the High Court Rules was refused because the statement sought to be adduced was not fresh: it had been filed with the Tribunal and its substance was already before the Tribunal in other forms. The court nonetheless directed that the appeal hearing should take the explanations contained in that statement into account and confirmed timetabling orders to progress the appeal; it declined to admit the recent supplementary affidavit for interlocutory consideration due to irrelevance and unsupported allegations.