20 Jun 2007
MATUKITUKI TRUST V QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL HC CHCH CIV 2006-412-000733
- Citation
- openlaw-25fa3bb8_95c5_4b2b_a134_6f2131d9c0c1.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Original Plan Change 9 was invalid because the Council did not serve notice in accordance with the First Schedule to the RMA; accordingly s88A(1A) applies and the Farm Buildings application must be processed, considered and decided as the type of activity it was at lodgement (a controlled activity); declarations to that effect are granted.