2 Mar 2017
MARK ALBERT HORSFALL v DIANA JANE POTTER [2017] NZSC 21
- Citation
- [2017] NZSC 21
- Court
- Supreme Court
Leave to appeal was granted because the application raises a substantive question about the application of the Potter v Potter principle to dispositions allegedly made to defeat a partner's claim under s 44, compounded by the applicant's tax position and attendant public policy considerations warranting possible Crown input.