8 May 2012
NDP 2010 LIMITED V RD2 INTERNATIONAL LIMITED HC AK CIV-2011-404-006549
- Citation
- openlaw-d95806f7_aa13_4561_b57b_e26647bbcafa.pdf
- Court
- High Court
NDP 2010 discharged the onus under s 290 by demonstrating a fairly arguable case that the alleged 18 February 2011 contract did not give rise to binding liability; material (the redlined 18 February email, the 1 February letter and subsequent correspondence) shows crucial terms remained unresolved so there is a genuine dispute requiring litigation rather than summary enforcement via statutory demand.