1 Mar 2004
DAVID JOHN GLAISTER, LOMOND MAURICE SEEL AND ROBERT NAREV V AMALGAMATED DAIRIES LIMITED And Anor CA CA99/03
- Citation
- openlaw-11639c69_2356_416a_a9b5_bc81f2b0b464.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The appellants' core contention that a successful High Court litigant is automatically entitled to two-thirds of actual and reasonable costs is incorrect; the High Court Rules create an objective deemed costs regime and the trial judge did not err in applying the Rules, exercising his r46 discretion in a particularised way, refusing to revisit his earlier costs order, and thereby the appeal is dismissed.