19 Nov 2010
MOFFATT V NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT AGENCY HC CHCH CIV 2010-409-002397
- Citation
- openlaw-e116c1a4_f753_4dde_b18d_123ea1dff362.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The Court declined to set aside the interim order because there was an arguable exercise of government power susceptible to judicial review, the potential deprivation of livelihood (business turnover $40,000-$60,000/month) required careful scrutiny under authorities such as Ridge v Baldwin, and the public safety concerns did not, on the material before the Court, overwhelmingly justify terminating interim relief; the interim order therefore remains subject to an expedited substantive hearing.