10 Feb 2015
BEAZLEY v TAUARIKI & OR [2015] NZHC 116
- Citation
- [2015] NZHC 116
- Court
- High Court
Respondents were not entitled to priority as administrators and their continued involvement threatened disagreement and disproportionate expense in a small estate; removal under s21(1) as expedient was justified, the estate vests in the applicants as administrators as joint tenants, and appointment of Public Trust was unnecessary absent misconduct or cross-application; costs awarded on a limited 2B basis.