9 Apr 2019
WHICHMAN v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS [2019] NZHC 747
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 747
- Court
- High Court
The warrant was valid because it explicitly remanded the applicant for the period of the adjournment and thus provided lawful authority for detention; typographical or outcome-notation errors in the warrant do not invalidate detention; complaints about placement or conditions of detention (including segregation from convicted prisoners) are matters for judicial review, not for habeas corpus, and repeat applications raising substantially the same issues may be dismissed.