14 Sept 2005
RECREATIONAL SERVICES LIMITED V QBE INSURANCE (INTERNATIONAL) LIMITED HC AK CIV-2004-404-7111
- Citation
- openlaw-4d9d09a1_e939_4f59_bb71_d226ab97f905.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Exclusion 17 (faulty workmanship) is to be read to include the costs reasonably necessary to put right the insured's faulty workmanship, including restoration of property damaged by that faulty work; exclusion 18 was ambiguous as to 'servicing' and construed for the insured, but because exclusion 17 applied the insurer was entitled to decline cover for the restoration costs, so the appeal is dismissed.