8 Dec 2020
JENSEN v R [2020] NZHC 3237
- Citation
- [2020] NZHC 3237
- Court
- High Court
The updated psychologist evidence, even if admitted in part, did not establish a real likelihood that publication of the appellant's name would cause extreme hardship to his elderly mother; speculative risk of malicious social media commentary was insufficient; therefore the statutory threshold under s 200 was not met and permanent name suppression was correctly declined.