30 Sept 1994
Pedersen v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation
- Citation
- (1994) 1 BACR 63
- Court
- District Court
The laser treatment, on the facts and specialist evidence, constituted a necessary and appropriate procedure not specified in the Schedule and therefore payable under Regulation 5(1); disposables are not a "procedure" and are not payable under the Regulations, so the appeal is allowed only for the $400 laser charge.