7 Jun 2006
PALMER V THE SUPERINTENDENT OF AUCKLAND PRISON HC AK CIV 2006-404-002065
- Citation
- openlaw-13cbd5eb_88c3_46bd_b124_059db112a6c8.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Because two convictions that had driven the preventive detention were quashed and the sentence imposed for the remaining convictions had already been served, the proper course was to declare the applicant released and refuse the issuance of a writ as unnecessary.