20 Oct 2021
The appeal was allowed because the convictions for assault were quashed as unsafe; the sentence of four and a half months' home detention was quashed and in its place one month's home detention was imposed on the charge of breach of a protection order; all other aspects of the sentence remain unchanged.
20 Apr 2021
The Court concluded the convictions were unsafe and quashed them and exercised its discretion not to order a new trial.
29 Oct 2019
Convictions for discharging a firearm and accessing a computer system were quashed because they were withdrawn and entered erroneously; the sentence of four years and eight months was not manifestly excessive because the judge's chosen starting point, uplift, and generous application of the 25% guilty plea discount (appropriately reflecting remorse in context) were within acceptable ranges and s27 factors were taken into account via a six month deduction.
12 Apr 2017
Leave to appeal out of time was granted and the extended supervision order was quashed because the convictions providing its jurisdictional basis had been quashed, eliminating the legal foundation for the order.
21 Oct 2015
The Court was satisfied the convictions on both counts were unsafe and allowed the appeal, quashed the convictions and remitted the proceeding for retrial; it did not determine the sentence appeal.
26 May 2015
Leave to appeal was granted to allow the Supreme Court to determine whether R v Antonievic was correctly decided and, if not, whether that error requires quashing the convictions; jurisdictional questions under s 383 need not be argued at this stage.