13 Jul 2009
NANDRO HOMES LIMITED AND ORS V DATT HC AK CIV-2008-404-006676
- Citation
- openlaw-0d8a8164_8400_4ce7_a7d6_83cbfe70dfb2.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Indemnity costs are not warranted because the respondents' conduct, while futile in relitigating settled matters, was sincere and not flagrantly vexatious; increased costs are justified because the Datts improperly reopened litigation already settled, so award 2B costs in both courts plus an additional $7,000 to mark the futile re‑litigation.