2 Mar 2004
Mete v Accident Compensation Corporation
- Citation
- [2004] NZACC 28
- Court
- District Court
The Reviewer erred by refusing costs in blanket fashion; the applicant acted reasonably in lodging the review and is therefore entitled to costs for lodging the review and for the Haddad report, but the additional disbursements for reports from Dr Worsley and Dr Cox were not reasonably incurred and are not recoverable; appellate costs of $350 were awarded.