1 Apr 2021
EEN v BODY CORPORATE 384911 [2021] NZHC 729
- Citation
- [2021] NZHC 729
- Court
- High Court
The minority failed to meet the high threshold under s 210 because they receive a benefit from the security covering their units and common areas, they had rejected a prior offer by the hotel to provide security at no cost, the Body Corporate reasonably adopted an alternative to protect against liability and insurance risk, the security contract was tendered at market rates, and the apportioned cost per unit (approximately $151.80/month) was modest; therefore the effect of the resolution was not unjust or inequitable.