8 Nov 2013
REYNOLDS v BARRATT FAMILY TRUST [2013] NZHC 2992
- Citation
- [2013] NZHC 2992
- Court
- High Court
Service of the orders for examination was valid by posting to the specified PO Box under r6.1 and complied with r17.13 (which concerns timing not method); the sealed judgment could not be recalled under r11.9 and could not be substantively altered under r11.10 to introduce a limitation of liability not raised at the summary judgment hearing; accordingly the defendants' applications to recall or correct the sealed judgment were dismissed; the examination may extend to both trust assets and the defendants' personal means.