21 Apr 2023
The application for transcript and for a listening facility was declined because the applicant failed to show any good reason to justify production of a transcript or to recall the court's earlier decision declining transcription.
21 Feb 2022
Leave to appeal was refused because the alleged error lacked material significance or wider implications, the grounds for strike out can be pursued in the District Court, and the applicant failed to establish demonstrable injustice justifying interlocutory appeal.
29 Jun 2017
The repeat application for recall was an abuse of process and the application for review under s 28(2) was either unavailable in the circumstances or an abuse/moot because the Registrar's initial intituling error had been corrected by judicial direction and the applicant obtained the outcome sought; both applications are dismissed and the Registrar is directed not to accept further filings in the matter.
31 Aug 2016
The Appeal Authority does not have jurisdiction to recall an earlier sealed (perfected) decision; that conclusion is reinforced where the sealed decision has been appealed to and considered by a higher court; the 'justice of the case' or 'exceptional circumstances' principles did not justify recall in this case.
7 May 2015
Leave to institute the proposed judicial review was refused because the proposed proceedings were an abuse of process, the allegations were untenable and repetitive, the District Court had already given reasons, and there was no merit in further attempts by a declared vexatious litigant to relitigate the matter.
28 May 2014
The appeal was dismissed: the allegation of apparent bias against the Tribunal members was not established under the Saxmere/Siemer test; the Tribunal correctly held it had no jurisdiction to recall its costs decision (and would not have exercised such jurisdiction); the appropriate remedy for challenges to the substantive costs decision was appeal or judicial review of that decision; the appellant's failure to file submissions or attend the hearing undermined his case.