12 May 2017
BODY CORPORATE 207650 v KATY SPECK RYAN SPECK [2017] NZHC 966
- Citation
- (2017) 18 NZCPR 742
- Court
- High Court
The Court held that the sanctioned s 74 scheme must be interpreted broadly to include all remedial works necessary to bring the complex to a state of code compliance; the increased costs (including timber replacement error, intertenancy wall works, roof truss replacement, extensions of time and other variations) fell within that scope and therefore the body corporate had power to impose the second levy.