14 Oct 2011
The appeal was struck out because the appellant ceased instructing counsel, failed to respond to repeated registry directions and correspondence, the Registry was unable to contact her, and there had been more than two and a half years without substantive action; accordingly the Court exercised its power under s 161(3)(b) to strike out the appeal for non-prosecution.
18 Apr 2007
The appeal is dismissed under section 161(3)(a) because the appellant, having been given notice and opportunity to file submissions, failed to appear at the appointed hearing without reasonable excuse.
1 Mar 2001
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellant failed to comply with repeated requests and deadlines, did not file submissions or apply for an extension of time, and did not respond to contact attempts, rendering dismissal appropriate.
23 Feb 1999
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution because the appellant repeatedly failed to file submissions or respond to multiple written requests from the Registrar, justifying dismissal to ensure orderly and efficient administration of the court process.