20 May 2008
JEFFRIES V THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL HC WN CIV 2006-485-2161
- Citation
- openlaw-a44e68e0_9d4d_4018_949f_59dee8b1a368.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The consent conditions did not require development of the high-end brand; the OIC/OIO reasonably and continuously monitored the Powells' compliance under s9(1)(f) and did not unlawfully suspend monitoring; the Minister made no decision varying obligations; the OIO lawfully assessed release under the Official Information Act; and the plaintiff lacked standing to challenge the first part of the proceedings, so all claims fail.