6 Nov 2000
Impact Manufacturing Limited v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation
- Citation
- [2000] NZACC 305
- Court
- District Court
Leave to appeal was refused because the challenged findings were matters of primary fact supported by extensive and competing medical evidence; no legal error was shown under Edwards v Bairstow; the trial judge validly applied s7(1)(a)-(c) on the balance of probabilities; and the costs award fell within judicial discretion.