29 Apr 2009
HITECH INVESTMENT V WORLD AVIATION SYSTEMS HC AK CIV 2008-404-4189
- Citation
- openlaw-9556c6a5_866f_46fe_a03f_8ea4f7e00bf0.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Leave to appeal was refused because the proposed question for the Court of Appeal formulated by the applicant raised a new issue going beyond the questions originally granted for appeal, would widen the scope impermissibly, and was not of sufficient importance to outweigh the cost and delay of further appeal; on the merits the High Court answered that the landlord's notice was not ineffective and equitable relief for unjust enrichment or setting aside was not available on these facts.