22 Feb 2000
Foss v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation
- Citation
- [2000] NZACC 30
- Court
- District Court
The appellant did not alter her position in reliance on the overpayment because she spent the funds on ordinary day-to-day living without entering long-term commitments or obligations dependent on the payments; therefore the statutory precondition in s77(2) was not met and remission must be refused, so the respondent's decision is upheld.