22 Nov 2012
XING HUA (DAVID) DU V MING GU HC AK CIV-2009-404-5577
- Citation
- openlaw-dd4ba338_c775_41a5_877a_6f0844e488e7.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Freezing order discharged because, although plaintiff has an arguable monetary claim, the court was not satisfied there was a sufficient identified risk of dissipation given the property is a family home occupied by the defendant's family, the defendant regularly resides in New Zealand for significant periods and has given evidence of no intention to sell; therefore interim relief derogating from the owner's rights was not justified.