29 Sept 2017
CARTER v CAPITAL AND COAST DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD [2017] NZHC 2398
- Citation
- [2017] NZFLR 745
- Court
- High Court
The application was struck out under HCR rr5.35A–5.35B because it was a plain abuse of process: it failed to comply with Part 18 requirements, did not adequately identify or demonstrate that any named or unnamed individual was illegally detained or fit to be discharged under s84(3), lacked evidence of authorization to act for third parties, and improperly sought to advance generalized criticisms of psychiatric treatment rather than requisite factual allegations.