9 Dec 2008
Rogers v Accident Compensation Corporation
- Citation
- [2008] NZACC 289
- Court
- District Court
The appeal is dismissed because the Notice of Appeal was filed out of time and no enlargement was granted, the substantive claim lacked merit on the medical evidence which established no causal link between the covered injuries and cervical degeneration, and the 19 October 2006 letter merely confirmed an earlier decision that had been reviewed and upheld so res judicata applied.