22 Mar 2005
Peacock v Accident Compensation Corporation
- Citation
- [2005] NZACC 80
- Court
- District Court
The 25 August 2000 letter constituted a reviewable decision under s13(b) refusing further vocational rehabilitation funding; the Reviewer was wrong to conclude he lacked jurisdiction and must reconsider the merits of that decision; consequently the related appeal on capacity for work is adjourned pending the outcome of that review; costs of $750 awarded to the appellant for this appeal.