25 Jun 2012
Q V Q HC AK CIV 2011-404-6890
- Citation
- openlaw-81268264_f90e_41ed_bfcf_761a8d5d2511.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the final protection order because the Family Court placed excessive weight on the applicant's subjective perception of risk without adequately taking into account countervailing evidence and factors raised by the respondent; on the proper Surrey v Surrey approach the evidence was insufficient to satisfy the statutory necessity requirement in s14(1)(b).